![medical-malpractice-1024x682[1]](https://www.mcarthurlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/medical-malpractice-1024x6821-1.jpg "medical-malpractice-1024x682[1]")
![truck-crashes-1024x681[1]](https://www.mcarthurlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/truck-crashes-1024x6811.jpg "truck-crashes-1024x681[1]")
![work-injuries-1024x667[1]](https://www.mcarthurlawfirm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/work-injuries-1024x6671.jpg "work-injuries-1024x667[1]")
Over a year ago, we brought you the story of an Uber driver who had been hit at over 100 mph. The driver of that car was allegedly using Snapchat at the time of the crash. So, the wife of the Uber driver sued Snapchat, but the judge dismissed the claim. Now, an appeals court has handed down a ruling about the Snapchat speed filter—reigniting an almost forgotten case. The Resurrection of the Snapchat Speed Filter Lawsuit When the wife of the Uber driver who sustained a traumatic brain injury filed a lawsuit against Snapchat, the case was met with skepticism. The judge overseeing the lawsuit ruled that under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), Snapchat could not be held liable for the speed filter post. This is because the CDA protects internet service providers from liability when it comes to the creation and publication of content made…
Read More »
Call 24/7: 
